The United States Supreme Court rejected a request from the Trump administration on Monday, November 3, just hours before the final day of midterm election voting. The administration had sought to force California to set aside approximately 20,000 ballots from individuals the federal government claimed were noncitizens.
Supreme Court Rejects Last-Minute Ballot Challenge
The court’s decision came at a critical moment. Voters across the country were preparing to cast their final ballots in what many described as a pivotal midterm election cycle. The ruling effectively blocked the administration’s effort to invalidate tens of thousands of California votes.
Stay connected to every major update — subscribe and follow us on the PhoenixQ website and across our social media platforms.
The Trump administration argued that the ballots in question belonged to individuals who were not eligible to vote as United States citizens. California officials, however, disputed that claim. The state pushed back against the federal government’s attempt to intervene in its electoral process.
Timing Raises Concerns Over Election Interference
The timing of the request drew significant attention. The administration filed its push to remove the ballots just before polls closed on the final day of voting. Critics argued the move amounted to a last-minute attempt to suppress legitimate votes in a heavily Democratic state.
California is one of the most populous states in the country. Therefore, any effort to discard 20,000 ballots there carries considerable political weight. The Supreme Court’s refusal to act on the request meant those ballots remained valid and eligible for counting.
FRANCE 24 correspondent Wassim Cornet reported on the development as results from the midterm elections began to emerge. The court’s decision represented a significant legal setback for the Trump administration’s election strategy. It also reinforced the principle that last-minute federal challenges to state ballot processes face an extremely high legal bar.
The ruling did not include a detailed written explanation from the justices. However, the decision was clear. The Supreme Court declined to intervene, allowing California election authorities to proceed with counting all ballots already submitted.
English

























































