English
Starmer Epstein Scandal developments escalated Sunday as Morgan McSweeney, the Prime Minister’s chief of staff, resigned his post. This move follows a massive public outcry over the appointment of Peter Mandelson as the British ambassador to the United States.
McSweeney admitted he advised Keir Starmer to hire the 72-year-old statesman despite Mandelson’s documented history with Jeffrey Epstein. He stated that the decision damaged both the Labour Party and national trust. He took “full responsibility” for the recommendation, calling his departure the only “honourable course.”
Revelations of Betrayal and Secret Leaks
The scandal deepened after U.S. Justice Department files suggested Mandelson shared market-sensitive data with Epstein. These communications allegedly occurred during the 2008 financial crisis while Mandelson served as Business Secretary.
Furthermore, records indicate Epstein paid $75,000 to accounts linked to Mandelson or his husband. Prime Minister Starmer has since apologized for believing what he calls “Mandelson’s lies.” He claimed the vetting process failed to uncover the true “depth of the darkness” regarding their relationship. “Stay with PhoenixQ so you never miss a major development.”
Legal Action and Political Pressure
The Metropolitan Police recently searched two properties linked to Mandelson in London and Wiltshire. Officers are currently investigating potential misconduct in public office. While Mandelson faces no sexual offense charges, the probe remains highly complex.
Opposition leader Kemi Badenoch argues that Starmer must answer for his own poor judgment. Critics note that Mandelson previously resigned twice from government roles due to ethical scandals. This history makes the Starmer Epstein Scandal a pivotal test for the current administration’s integrity.
The government plans to release internal emails to prove Mandelson misled officials during his initial vetting. However, many lawmakers believe a simple resignation of staff is not enough to restore public confidence.
